|
|
Post by tobysi on Jul 28, 2017 2:49:53 GMT -5
It's possible, but they are usually the same. Check aimAssistRange and aimAssistRangeAds. Thanks! |
|
|
|
Post by tobysi on Jul 29, 2017 21:04:54 GMT -5
Did 3arc change the kvk-99m long barrel? I keep seeing people say that on reddit. Is it still a 2x multiplier or what?
|
|
|
|
Post by Marvel4 on Jul 30, 2017 10:41:03 GMT -5
It wasn't changed.
|
|
|
|
Post by tobysi on Jul 30, 2017 15:41:32 GMT -5
|
|
banana
True Banana
Zoro > Law
Posts: 1,577
|
Post by banana on Aug 4, 2017 20:47:29 GMT -5
Only the ballistic variants. Does a accelfiretime of 0.135 mean it shoots faster or slower for the first shots? |
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Aug 5, 2017 13:13:16 GMT -5
I assume that's the fire time of how many first shots fire at that rate. So it's 444 RPM for however many shots. Idk what the RoF for the base Volk is off the top of my head.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marvel4 on Aug 11, 2017 15:27:59 GMT -5
Updated the Modern Warfare Remastered spreadsheet.
|
|
|
|
Post by tobysi on Aug 14, 2017 1:27:39 GMT -5
Marvel, can you please please look at the kvk-99m long barrel again? I've tested it in private match and it barely gives any bonus to the 3 shot kill, or the 4 shot kill for that matter. There's no way it still gives a 2x bonus.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marvel4 on Aug 20, 2017 13:25:58 GMT -5
Updated the Black Ops III spreadsheet.
|
|
|
|
Post by grimm8420 on Sept 12, 2017 21:22:16 GMT -5
Will you be doing stats for WWII?
|
|
|
|
Post by infowantstobefree on Nov 16, 2017 16:05:06 GMT -5
-zip-
|
|
pachiderm
True Bro
Chewing some serious leaves
Posts: 647
|
Post by pachiderm on Nov 16, 2017 16:15:58 GMT -5
Nice job, Julian Assange.
|
|
|
|
Post by infowantstobefree on Nov 16, 2017 16:41:13 GMT -5
post on your main you fuc king pussy new phone who dis??? |
|
eLantern
True Bro
"Oh, cruel fate, to be thusly boned! Ask not for whom the bone bones, it bones for thee!" - Bender
Posts: 10,761
|
Post by eLantern on Nov 29, 2017 14:51:44 GMT -5
Will you be doing stats for WWII? @ Marvel4I too would love to know if you're planning on doing the stats for WWII? The information you provide is always extremely appreciated. |
|
|
|
Post by Marvel4 on Mar 3, 2018 17:53:01 GMT -5
Added WWII.
|
|
JustABitAgroed
True Bro
Reasons to never go on GFAQs: 1. I'm considered an expert there. 2. It's GFAQs. I mean, come on man.
Posts: 345 
|
Post by JustABitAgroed on Mar 5, 2018 8:50:14 GMT -5
You can't expect him to do all the legwork. He's a busy man.
|
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Mar 5, 2018 13:04:35 GMT -5
I'm only seeing the Raw Weapons and Raw Attachments data in the WWII spreadsheet, when I view it online. Feel free to do it yourself m8 |
|
Usagi
True Bro
Grin and Barrett
Posts: 1,674
|
Post by Usagi on Mar 5, 2018 13:54:28 GMT -5
its not that hard to read
|
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Mar 5, 2018 19:27:53 GMT -5
its not that hard to read Yeah but it's still an ass ache harder than a full-on, well done table. It's only really easy to read if you know what stats you're looking for on here (vs. the old weapon charts that had the important stuff you'd need). |
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Mar 5, 2018 22:11:58 GMT -5
Making one myself, based on the template of BO3's spreadsheet. Just taking the time to copy over the info.
|
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Mar 6, 2018 13:57:09 GMT -5
I'm positive Marvel4's spreadsheets should be displaying the Weapons tab where the data is properly organized. There is an error in the Google Docs spreadsheets for the WWII and Infinite Warfare weapons stats, where the Weapons tab is missing. All of the other spreadsheets previous to Infinite Warfare have the weapons tab visible. I originally thought it was a bug on my Android tablet but it also occurs in Open Office on my PC and all my web browsers. This is how all the other spreadsheets appear online:  Here is how the WWII and Infinite Warfare spreadsheets appear online:   I appreciate the great work Marvel4 does on the spreadsheets but I doubt it is his intent to just publish the raw weapons data. Wha....what? I'm not exactly sure what you're complaining about...you're looking at the 'weapons tab' right there, with all the same stats as previous charts. The only difference is that it's not as organized before. |
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Mar 6, 2018 19:54:44 GMT -5
The weapons tab is missing from the WWII and Infinite Warfare spreadsheets, it is not missing in the Modern Warfare Remastered spreadsheet. All of Marvel4's spreadsheets from Modern Warfare to Modern Warfare Remastered have included the weapons tab as the default view, so the the data is properly organized. Modern Warfare Remastered and Infinite Warfare were released at the same time. Why are you assuming Marvel4 has decided to just stop including the Weapons tab and just display the Raw Weapons data? All of his other spreadsheets have had the Raw Weapons data but they also have the Weapons tab, so the statistics are easy to find. He has never said he is changing the format of his weapon stats. Hopefully Marvel4 will notice the spreadsheets have an error and fix the problem so the headings show up. You can't fix a problem if you don't acknowledge its existence. I don't know how to explain it to you further. There is no difference between the WW2 and IW spreadsheet and the weapons tab outside of the aesthetics. It's not an error, Marvel4 presumably just doesn't want to be ass-ached with putting the graphs together. It probably takes a bit of time. Learn how to use the current graph and stop complaining about such an unimportant factor, make your own spreadsheet like Marvel's (as I'm doing), or use Lacking's/wait until someone else publishes their own spreadsheet. It's not Marvel's job to appease you. |
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Mar 6, 2018 20:41:17 GMT -5
If the ranges are missing, then what the hell are these?   For you No shit, so what's your point? No, you're complaining like a child about something that: 1) has already been done by others, 2) you could do, 3) is being done by others I'm aware of that. And he obviously hasn't done the work because those tabs are greyed out. It means there's nothing there. It's not. And you seriously think Marvel has gone a year without noticing that his spreadsheets have had their information like this? Do you think that you're the first person to mention this? Hell, I probably complained for a minute until I figured out how to actually use the raw spreadsheet as well. So here's my advice to you, again: adapt. |
|
Usagi
True Bro
Grin and Barrett
Posts: 1,674
|
Post by Usagi on Mar 6, 2018 21:51:42 GMT -5
All of the ADS spread values seem wrong, take a second look at those. There's no way every gun has a spread of at least 1 and snipers do not have a spread of 6. |
|
JustABitAgroed
True Bro
Reasons to never go on GFAQs: 1. I'm considered an expert there. 2. It's GFAQs. I mean, come on man.
Posts: 345
|
Post by JustABitAgroed on Mar 7, 2018 7:58:46 GMT -5
All of the ADS spread values seem wrong, take a second look at those. There's no way every gun has a spread of at least 1 and snipers do not have a spread of 6. The min spread values definitely look to be more in line with what the max spreads should be. Not sure what's going on with those. |
|
Usagi
True Bro
Grin and Barrett
Posts: 1,674
|
Post by Usagi on Mar 7, 2018 14:58:26 GMT -5
I think Treyarch is the only dev that likes to give weapons ADS spread greater than 0. IIRC, the SMGs in BO3 had very small spreads of 0.1 or 0.3 so anything 1 or higher is really extreme and can't be correct.
|
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Mar 7, 2018 17:53:31 GMT -5
I think Treyarch is the only dev that likes to give weapons ADS spread greater than 0. IIRC, the SMGs in BO3 had very small spreads of 0.1 or 0.3 so anything 1 or higher is really extreme and can't be correct. I think he was looking at the 'adsSpread' stat, which shows various figures ranging from 1 to 6. But they're definitely not the correct ads spread figures. Instead, it seems like the 'adsSpreadMin' figure is what's actually used in-game and should be the figures recorded for ADS spread (for those who are curious, look in column GP for these figures).  The box with the blue edge around it is the 'adsSpreadMin' column. |
|
|
|
Post by -3055- on Mar 8, 2018 20:31:41 GMT -5
wait so SMGs do have a very very very slight spread when ADS?
|
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Mar 8, 2018 23:42:01 GMT -5
wait so SMGs do have a very very very slight spread when ADS? Seems so. Unless Marvel wants to correct me possibly but I think I'm right. |
|
|
|
Post by -3055- on Mar 9, 2018 15:44:12 GMT -5
wild. I haven't seemed to notice it though, so I'm guessing the spread is basically negligible?
|
|
