b0xr
True Bro
[2.0+ KD, 2.0+ WL, ~350 SPM] Stats mean nothing. GLHF :)
Posts: 210
|
Post by b0xr on May 7, 2013 22:28:27 GMT -5
wiki is a goldmine of misinformation. it has approximate knowledge of many things. set them straight marvel! you're the king of accuracy and diligence.
|
|
Dumien
True Bro
Black Market Trader
No engrams. Only disappointment.
Posts: 3,292
|
Post by Dumien on May 7, 2013 23:41:58 GMT -5
Have you ever considered starting your own wiki?
|
|
42
True Bro
Bingo Bango Bongo
Posts: 1,588
|
Post by 42 on May 8, 2013 0:07:17 GMT -5
It takes a ton of work and constant maintenance. It's a miracle the CoD wiki isn't worse than already is.
|
|
|
Post by jaedrik on Nov 22, 2013 22:17:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Nintendon't on Nov 22, 2013 23:15:42 GMT -5
Why would anyone go to the COD Wiki for stats anyway?
|
|
|
Post by jaedrik on Nov 22, 2013 23:25:55 GMT -5
Why would anyone go to the COD Wiki for stats anyway? Because I like the truth damn it.
|
|
|
Post by ChloeB42 (Alexcalibur42) on Nov 23, 2013 0:56:39 GMT -5
Lololololol Buncha cunts. "Too complex" hurt durr what is basic math. Then again most cod players are still in Middle School
|
|
|
Post by imrlybord7 on Nov 23, 2013 3:39:37 GMT -5
I'm an admin there, inactive for a long time. Community used to have more than enough chill intelligent people to balance out the awfulness, but that ended a long time ago. I was the bro who brought Denliness to the wiki in the first place, and my god were they pains in the ass about it. Of course they would turn their back on stat scripture again. Holy hell.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2013 6:39:43 GMT -5
^The other party finds multiplication hard/complex^
Why the Foxtrot do you guys even bother?
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Nov 24, 2013 10:20:07 GMT -5
I honestly think that Sam can be a bit of a douche sometimes, but otherwise is okay. And what incorrect information are you guys talking about?
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Nov 24, 2013 10:22:32 GMT -5
I just put the 45 damage correct for the KSG page. Let's see what happens now.
|
|
|
Post by jaedrik on Nov 24, 2013 11:31:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Nov 24, 2013 11:47:09 GMT -5
Didn't you already prove you were right on the talk page though? You should be allowed to make the edit now.
|
|
|
Post by jaedrik on Nov 24, 2013 12:06:25 GMT -5
Didn't you already prove you were right on the talk page though? You should be allowed to make the edit now. To quote Probaddie: "You could be Mark Rubin with game code in hand and they'd still not believe you." I, however, have hope for it, but shudder when I think of what has happened. Eh, I had a few long talks with them in the chat, Sam was incredibly vague, referencing the talk page when he told me 'no' to not edit. Callofduty4, bless him, I've gained his trust, but he just told me to wait, and that's what I'm doing. Waiting. Also, it appears I did not format the references correctly, I know all I have to do is look at another page with proper references and copy/modify that reference format. I kinda think it was a noble excuse that Callofduty4 made when he told me that he would rather have a reference to the post in the singular instead of the thread (you know, the little gear icon next to the posts here and then 'link to post'), I brought up your reference in the Deadeye page to the proboards (not directly), and asked if I should give the same treatment to it, he said 'if you think it'll improve the wiki, no need to ask', and I said 'well last time I thought I was proving the wiki my edit got undone :P' so then we kinda moved on. The reason why I think it is a noble excuse, is that even though he trusts me more, now, he still felt attached or obligated to the defense of the undo just so I wouldn't have the justification to undo it right then and there, whether wittingly or unwittingly. Edit: Also, I didn't 'correct' your reference in the Deadeye page because it was just a little green puzzle piece square thingie when I went to edit, and then I got intimidated by it and clicked X in a panic :D
|
|
|
Post by kylet357 on Nov 24, 2013 12:17:04 GMT -5
To quote Probaddie: "You could be Mark Rubin with game code in hand and they'd still not believe you." I, however, have hope for it, but shudder when I think of what has happened. Eh, I had a few long talks with them in the chat, Sam was incredibly vague, referencing the talk page when he told me 'no' to not edit. Callofduty4, bless him, I've gained his trust, but he just told me to wait, and that's what I'm doing. Waiting. Also, it appears I did not format the references correctly, I know all I have to do is look at another page with proper references and copy/modify that reference format. I kinda think it was a noble excuse that Callofduty4 made when he told me that he would rather have a reference to the post in the singular instead of the thread (you know, the little gear icon next to the posts here and then 'link to post'), I brought up your reference in the Deadeye page to the proboards (not directly), and asked if I should give the same treatment to it, he said 'if you think it'll improve the wiki, no need to ask', and I said 'well last time I thought I was proving the wiki my edit got undone ' so then we kinda moved on. The reason why I think it is a noble excuse, is that even though he trusts me more, now, he still felt attached or obligated to the defense of the undo just so I wouldn't have the justification to undo it right then and there, whether wittingly or unwittingly. Edit: Also, I didn't 'correct' your reference in the Deadeye page because it was just a little green puzzle piece square thingie when I went to edit, and then I got intimidated by it and clicked X in a panic I'll talk with CoD4, me and him are pretty cool with each other.
|
|
|
Post by jaedrik on Nov 24, 2013 12:19:12 GMT -5
I'll talk with CoD4, me and him are pretty cool with each other. <3
|
|
42
True Bro
Bingo Bango Bongo
Posts: 1,588
|
Post by 42 on Nov 24, 2013 17:11:27 GMT -5
I honestly think that Sam can be a bit of a douche sometimes, but otherwise is okay. And what incorrect information are you guys talking about? marvel thinks hes a fu cking moro n He is a fuc king idi ot. I've talked to the guy.
|
|
Dumien
True Bro
Black Market Trader
No engrams. Only disappointment.
Posts: 3,292
|
Post by Dumien on Nov 24, 2013 19:52:54 GMT -5
Sam is an asshole that doesn't admit when it is wrong. Also, it is rather elitist,
but then again.... so are we.
Also, CoD4 has been overly defensive in many different cases. Positive bias in. Negative bias out.
|
|
42
True Bro
Bingo Bango Bongo
Posts: 1,588
|
Post by 42 on Nov 24, 2013 19:57:37 GMT -5
Sam is an asshole that doesn't admit when it is wrong. Also, it is rather elitist, but then again.... so are we. Also, CoD4 has been overly defensive in many different cases. Positive bias in. Negative bias out. But we're right and they're wrong!
|
|