|
Post by lloydrage on Jul 7, 2009 9:44:08 GMT -5
I finally hit presige 9, lvl 65 (my goal and where I am going to stay) so I started using the carbine and I am amazed on how good of a gun it is.
It has power, distance and accuracy. Its a really good gun I dont understand why more people arent using it.
What are your setting for the carbine?
I have been using bettys/bomb squad with stopping power and steady aim
|
|
mdnl
True Bro
www.youtube.com/NEILoRFCo
Posts: 10,856
|
Post by mdnl on Jul 7, 2009 10:56:46 GMT -5
I finally hit presige 9, lvl 65 (my goal and where I am going to stay) so I started using the carbine and I am amazed on how good of a gun it is. It has power, distance and accuracy. Its a really good gun I dont understand why more people arent using it. What are your setting for the carbine? I have been using bettys/bomb squad with stopping power and steady aim Most people don't use it because most people aren't on LVL 65. I use it in HC only, with an aperture as I find the default iron sights to be lacking. Bomb Squad Slight of Hand/Overkill with a sniper. Second Chance I wish it had a telescopic scope though, as it already holds more ammo than the other rifles in one clip so the round drum is really unnecessary.
|
|
|
Post by lloydrage on Jul 7, 2009 14:05:08 GMT -5
yeah telescope would put it over the top
not sure why they avoided that, they put scopes on all other rifles
|
|
|
Post by ssog on Jul 8, 2009 22:30:16 GMT -5
yeah telescope would put it over the top not sure why they avoided that, they put scopes on all other rifles Because if they gave the M1A1 a telescopic there would be literally no reason to ever use the Gewher/SVT again.
|
|
|
Post by lloydrage on Jul 9, 2009 7:48:13 GMT -5
why use the thompson/type 100/ppsh when you can use the MP40
that thought process would have changed the game a lot in making of guns
|
|
|
Post by ssog on Jul 9, 2009 23:33:13 GMT -5
why use the thompson/type 100/ppsh when you can use the MP40 that thought process would have changed the game a lot in making of guns Thompson/Type100 kill faster with SP than MP40 does with anything. They're also significantly better in HC (although the MP40 + SP fills a niche as the only SMG that's a 1-shot kill at any range). The PPSh is also the fastest killing SMG assuming less than 100% accuracy. Someone might think that the MP40 is better than the Type100, but the MP40 is not equal to or better than the Type100 in every single statistical category. The M1A1, however, *IS* equal to or better than the Gewher/SVT in every single statistical category. I mean, if you have one gun that deals 50 damage and fires twice a second, and another gun that deals 2 damage and fires 50 times a second, then those guns are functionally different- there are some statistical categories where the first gun tops the second gun, and some where the second gun tops the first. As a result, there are some reasons to use the first gun, and other reasons to use the second. If, on the other hand, you had a gun that dealt 50 damage and fired twice a second, and another gun that dealt 40 damage and fired twice a second, then the first gun equals or exceeds the second gun in every category, and as a result the second gun is redundant and rendered entirely useless by the first gun, which equals or exceeds it in every category. The M1A1 deals the same damage as the Gewher and SVT at any range. It has the same recoil, and the same rate of fire. All three guns have the same idle and hip-fire accuracy. The M1A1 does, however, have faster reload times *AND* a larger clip. Meanwhile, the only advantages the Gewher/SVT have over the M1A1 is their ironsights and a different set of attachments. Give the M1A1 the Gewher/SVT attachment set, and suddenly there's no more statistical reason to ever use the Gewher/SVT.
|
|
mdnl
True Bro
www.youtube.com/NEILoRFCo
Posts: 10,856
|
Post by mdnl on Jul 10, 2009 5:34:37 GMT -5
Depends on how the M1A1 looked through the scope, I can't use the Ghewer or the STG with the telescope as I don't like the iron scope being in view (who's idiot idea was that) whereas the SVT iron site is removed giving a clearer site.
|
|
|
Post by imrlybord7 on Jul 10, 2009 13:46:47 GMT -5
*Reads ssog's post* *Claps*
|
|