|
|
Post by saucejockey on Feb 6, 2012 21:50:46 GMT -5
I use the AN-94 a lot, and it sucks in CQB, so I use the flechette 320.
If I go underslung, will this affect the grenade reload time at all, and if so, how much?
|
|
|
|
Post by frankelstner on Feb 7, 2012 9:04:33 GMT -5
Nope, the only difference is the time to draw the weapon.
|
|
battleaxerx
True Bro
"You can't take the sky from me."
Posts: 773 
|
Post by battleaxerx on Feb 7, 2012 19:08:53 GMT -5
you mean M26 DART? I thought m320 only has smoke and buck...
|
|
|
|
Post by saucejockey on Feb 7, 2012 21:48:48 GMT -5
er sorry, buck.
|
|
|
|
Post by rudybojangles on Feb 8, 2012 3:31:29 GMT -5
M26 MASS has buck and frag rounds IIRC.
M320 has dart, and the reload time is the same as if you had smoke or frag.
Dunno if there is a difference between the RU and US
|
|
|
|
Post by rubionubio on Feb 8, 2012 9:16:05 GMT -5
What is the benefit to using the M320 vs. using the MASS? I don't seem to get any more one-hit kills then I do with the MASS, but it's a small sample size. I looked briefly for the stats on Den's chart but I couldn't see the buck-320 stats.
So my Bros, what the buck?
|
|
|
|
Post by baron on Feb 8, 2012 9:27:14 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure the buck has a huge pellet spread without sacrificing firepower. It's like a shotgun on steroids, given that it's over twice the caliber of a 12 gauge shotgun.
|
|
|
|
Post by rubionubio on Feb 8, 2012 14:33:03 GMT -5
That would make sense, but I must know the numbers! I need my fix, man!
|
|
|
|
Post by rudybojangles on Feb 8, 2012 16:31:59 GMT -5
That would make sense, but I must know the numbers! I need my fix, man! Just from my experience with both the MASS and the M320 DART, (I know, no numbers  ), the 320 had a satisfying kill range, and works well as a last millisecond saver, where the M26 works better when you know you can close on a cluster of enemies and dispatch them one by one in rapid succession. I got the majority (vast majority) of my 320 kills with the dart attachment and I only used buckshot on the MASS. I wonder if it has a headshot multiplier similar to the other shotguns? A couple of darts hit + one head hit = win? I too am vastly curious about the power and spread of the Dart! |
|
|
|
Post by rubionubio on Feb 8, 2012 17:39:38 GMT -5
For a game that has such great sound design I am consistently disappointed by the gun sounds. I mean, MW3 is WAAAAAAAAY over the top (Guns shouldn't sound like tearing sheet metal with the volume turned to 11) but really DICE? The MASS just goes *pop* and poops out some buckshot? And then the USuckAtShooting sounds like roaring hellfire??! The shotguns in general need some presence, they just don't sound intimidating enough. The M320 I can actually understand being quiet, as it's a low-speed bloop-tube. But seriously, who thought quiet guns was a good design choice?!?
|
|
|
|
Post by raxcoswell on Feb 8, 2012 17:49:51 GMT -5
guys guys what is this M320 dart
|
|
|
|
Post by fazzmania on Feb 8, 2012 18:08:35 GMT -5
|
|
), the 320 had a satisfying kill range, and works well as a last millisecond saver, where the M26 works better when you know you can close on a cluster of enemies and dispatch them one by one in rapid succession. I got the majority (vast majority) of my 320 kills with the dart attachment and I only used buckshot on the MASS. 
