|
|
Post by Protolisk on Nov 23, 2009 7:56:27 GMT -5
The m16 shoots faster overall but the famas fires its burst faster, as in the 3 are shot quicker
I think famas seeing as a quicker burst means easier to hit all 3 bullets
I would add a poll but idk how
|
|
|
|
Post by imrlybord7 on Nov 23, 2009 8:05:24 GMT -5
FAMAS is better for sniping and maybe CQC spraying, M16 for everything else.
Well, unless the FAMAS' higher ROF per burst increases recoil by enough that it makes the one burst less likely, in which case the M16 is the clear winner.
|
|
qupie
True Bro
Posts: 12,400
|
Post by qupie on Nov 23, 2009 9:28:32 GMT -5
I think FAMAS, because when you have the M16 you already have the tar (and scar for ppl who cant control the recoil) wich are better IMO...
|
|
|
|
Post by imrlybord7 on Nov 23, 2009 10:25:09 GMT -5
The TAR has a higher TTK if you are assuming perfect accuracy. Jus' sayin'
|
|
toysrme
True Bro
"Even at normal Health, there's no other choice than the Vector" Den Kirson
Posts: 1,339 
|
Post by toysrme on Nov 23, 2009 14:40:22 GMT -5
M16 ftmfw. you take an M16 to 2 shot people. if you're at a long range, lagging where you're doing it 1 shot at a time, or praying for that "OMG guys in cover, headshot or nothing.", or going for the M16 "steady aim shotgun" effect.
faster average fire rate = win
IDK, but if you follow some of the threads floating around afew forums the famas's long range damage has been occationally questioned. testing (by others not myself) has shown it to be 30, but, its concieveable it could be like the COD4 AK47 and recieves a penalty for attachments, etc. or... some people only get 2/3 bullets to hit at range, who knows.
In the end, damage wise id like to see the guns done in all attachment configs. Talking about alot of time doing that tho... For now iron sight only + common since is well & good.
|
|
